Five years after her father, a member of parliament, was murdered, Katie Amess told the BBC she is unconvinced that the safety of politicians has improved.
In an interview broadcast on the anniversary of the killing, she questioned whether government and parliamentary institutions had done enough to address the threats faced by elected officials. She said the risk to those who represent the public remains a serious concern.
Background
Amess, who has become a prominent voice in calls for greater protection of MPs, reflected on the continuing vulnerability of politicians when meeting constituents and carrying out public duties. Her comments come at a time when debates about the balance between accessibility and security for public servants persist in political circles.
Calls for review
While detailing her doubts about progress, she urged renewed attention from lawmakers and authorities to examine whether existing measures adequately safeguard those in public office. Campaigners and some parliamentary figures have previously argued for a reassessment of security arrangements to reduce risks without unduly restricting democratic engagement.
Looking ahead
Katie Amess’s remarks are likely to revive discussions about how best to protect elected representatives while maintaining open access between politicians and the public. The debate poses difficult questions about practical security steps, resource allocation and the preservation of democratic norms, all of which will be scrutinised as the anniversary prompts reflection on what, if anything, has changed.