IMF Urges Healey to Spare Banks and Look to Pensions and Welfare for Budget Savings

The International Monetary Fund has advised Chancellor John Healey to pursue savings from pensions and welfare programs rather than imposing additional taxes on banks in his upcoming budget, while supporters of a bank levy argue lenders were rescued with taxpayer funds and could shoulder extra charges.

The International Monetary Fund has recommended that Chancellor John Healey seek fiscal savings by adjusting pension and welfare spending instead of increasing levies on the banking sector, ahead of the UK budget later this month.

Helge Berger, deputy director of the IMF’s European department, made the comments when asked about proposals to raise revenue from banks after the Guardian reported that Healey is considering measures to tap the sector for additional income. The IMF view shifts the focus onto broader public spending choices rather than sector-specific taxation.

Supporters of a bank tax argue that such a measure would be justified on fairness grounds, noting that banks were rescued with taxpayer support during the financial crisis and are therefore able to contribute more now. They say a targeted levy could raise revenue without immediate cuts to public services.

Critics, and now the IMF, caution that taxing banks could have economic side effects and that policymakers should weigh those risks against the potential gains. The debate sets the stage for a testing fiscal settlement in a budget that will need to balance revenue-raising, growth, and political acceptability.

With the budget date approaching, ministers face a choice between measures that would spread the adjustment across public spending and those that would concentrate it on specific sectors. The IMF’s intervention highlights international scrutiny of the government’s fiscal strategy and underscores the trade-offs that will shape the final package.