Michael Olise underlines how the Ballon d’Or misses football’s sense of wonder

Michael Olise’s manner on the pitch and the way crowds hang on his every move illustrate an aspect of the game that single awards struggle to capture. A columnist recalls a childhood fixation on the captain’s armband after watching an active Ousmane Dembélé in France’s recent match with Belgium.

The Ballon d’Or has long been football’s most visible individual honour, rewarding consistency, statistics and headline moments over a season. But there is a competing language in the sport — the unquantifiable pleasure of watching a player whose presence transforms a stadium — that such prizes struggle to measure. Michael Olise, a winger whose style regularly elicits audible awe, is offered as an example of that other, harder-to-score quality.

Olise’s appeal, according to observers, is not simply in goals or assists but in the small, improvisational gestures that arrest attention: a measured touch, a sudden change of pace, a feint that sends a crowd into a shared intake of breath. Those episodes create a kind of currency of adulation that rewards spontaneity and elegance rather than the season-long accumulation of statistics that awards panels tend to favour.

The columnist connecting these ideas recalls a childhood desire to wear the captain’s armband, a simple symbol he equated with being the best player. Even after winning awards and helping teams to trophies, he says, that early yearning lingered — a reminder that symbolic recognition can matter as much as, or more than, formal accolades. That memory serves as a frame for the argument that public admiration and the status of being a crowd favourite are distinct from, and sometimes more resonant than, headline trophies.

He points to a recent UEFA Nations League meeting between France and Belgium as a prompt for the reflection. Ousmane Dembélé, wearing France’s captain’s armband in that match, was notably active and creative; the columnist notes that several potential assists were squandered by teammates’ wastefulness. The scene reinforced the idea that leadership and influence on the pitch are often manifested in ways that do not translate directly into personal awards.

The piece stops short of arguing that recognition like the Ballon d’Or is irrelevant. Instead it suggests that the award captures one dimension of excellence while missing another: the capacity of certain players to produce moments of collective wonder that linger in the memory of fans. In that sense, the author says, being adored in the stands can feel like a reward in its own right — and a reminder that football’s value lies as much in its aesthetics and communal experience as in measurable achievement.