PM’s new anti-disinformation unit wins cross-party support as Farage brands it an attack on free speech; Milburn writes to 100 firms on youth placements

The prime minister’s newly announced anti-disinformation unit has attracted backing from across the political spectrum despite criticism from Nigel Farage, who called it an assault on free speech and accused Burnham of using Russia as a pretext. Separately, Alan Milburn has written to 100 companies asking them to offer work placements and jobs to young people as part of his review into worklessness, the Press Association reports.

The prime minister’s new anti-disinformation unit has won support from lawmakers across party lines even as prominent critics have questioned its implications for free expression.

Nigel Farage described the initiative as an "attack on free speech" and said the unit — which he suggested was being established by Burnham — was being justified on the grounds that Russia might seek to interfere in elections. His comments came as debate over how to police online information intensified among politicians and commentators.

In a separate but related domestic policy move, Alan Milburn — the former Labour minister commissioned by former prime minister Keir Starmer to lead the government's review into worklessness — has written to around 100 firms requesting increased provision of work placements and jobs for young people, the Press Association reported. Milburn approached leaders in sectors including rail, transport and utilities to ask them to make more opportunities available to school and university leavers.

The Milburn review highlighted companies already taking part in its First Chance scheme, naming Royal Mail, Octopus Energy, Greene King and Lloyds bank as examples of firms offering opportunities to young people. The First Chance initiative stems from the review and is intended to create routes into employment for those leaving education.

Both developments form part of the government's wider domestic agenda: efforts to address perceived threats from misinformation and to reduce youth unemployment. Ministers and backbenchers will face continued scrutiny over how these programmes are implemented and balanced against concerns about free speech and the role of business in delivering public policy goals.