Poll: Majority of Israelis Say Settlements Policy Should Change to Avoid Further Sanctions

A new survey of Israeli public opinion finds that the UK’s decision to ban trade in goods from settlements was not a decisive factor for voters in the recent general election, but a majority support altering settlement policy if it would prevent additional sanctions.

A new poll of Israeli voters suggests that while Britain’s move to restrict trade with West Bank settlements did not decisively influence how people voted in the recent general election, most respondents believe Israel should reconsider its settlements policy if continuing it risks provoking further international sanctions.

The British government, led by foreign secretary Ed Miliband, announced in September a ban on trade in goods originating from settlements deemed illegal under international law, along with wider measures targeting settlement activity. That decision drew sharp criticism domestically and abroad, with some commentators arguing it might bolster support for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by energising right-wing voters.

The survey’s findings undercut that argument, indicating that the UK action was not a determining factor for most voters at the ballot box. Instead, the poll shows a sizeable share of Israelis view the prospect of additional sanctions as a reason to revisit current settlement policies, reflecting concern about diplomatic and economic fallout.

Observers say the results illustrate a complex domestic debate in Israel about the trade-offs between settlement expansion and the country’s international relationships. While the politics of settlements remain polarising, the poll points to a pragmatic strand of public opinion that prioritises avoiding punitive measures from overseas partners.

How the government responds to such public sentiment could affect future relations with European states that have signalled willingness to take measures against settlement activity. For now, the survey provides a snapshot of an electorate that, despite vociferous public debate, appears to weigh the costs of international isolation alongside ideological and security considerations.