UK would gain more from closer EU trade ties than separate FTAs, Scotland secretary says

Douglas Alexander, speaking on a trade delegation to India, told reporters the economic benefits of deeper joint trading arrangements with the EU outweigh the cost of surrendering unilateral free‑trade deal powers. Alexander, who served as trade minister under Prime Minister Keir Starmer, said closer alignment with Europe should be prioritised.

Scotland secretary Douglas Alexander said the United Kingdom stands to secure greater economic benefits from much closer trading relations with the European Union, even if that approach requires forgoing the ability to independently negotiate free‑trade agreements.

Delegation to India

Speaking while on a UK trade delegation to India, Alexander framed the choice as a question of practical gains versus formal autonomy. He argued that joint or closely aligned trading arrangements with EU partners could deliver a larger prize for British business than pursuing separate bilateral deals around the world.

Trade‑offs over autonomy

Alexander acknowledged the trade‑off involved in stepping back from unilateral negotiating powers, but presented it as a pragmatic decision rooted in likely economic outcomes. He pointed to his own experience negotiating deals with countries such as India and the United States while serving as trade minister in the Starmer government as background to his assessment.

Context and implications

His comments come amid ongoing debate in Westminster about the UK’s post‑Brexit trade strategy — balancing relationships with the EU, longstanding partners such as the US, and fast‑growing markets in Asia. Ministers and business groups have repeatedly weighed the value of regulatory alignment and market access against the flexibility of independent trade policy.

No immediate policy change was announced during the delegation. Alexander’s remarks are likely to feed into wider discussions within government about whether future trade policy should prioritise deeper EU integration on economic matters or a more independent, globally weighted approach to free‑trade agreements.