US military grants SpaceX access to restricted orbital tracking data, prompting security and influence concerns

The US military has provided Elon Musk’s SpaceX with access to restricted space‑tracking data, a move critics say could give the company an edge in monitoring orbital traffic and raise questions about influence and national security.

The US military has given SpaceX, the rocket and satellite company controlled by Elon Musk, access to restricted space‑tracking data, a development that industry observers say could afford the firm significant advantages in monitoring objects in Earth orbit.

The disclosure has reignited debate over whether the Trump administration is effectively ceding elements of orbital traffic management to a private company tied to a controversial donor. Critics and some industry figures warn the arrangement could create conflicts of interest and undermine public oversight of a critical national resource.

National security analysts have also flagged potential risks. Sensitive tracking data — used to locate and predict the paths of satellites, debris and other objects in space — is important for collision avoidance, military operations and intelligence. Granting preferential or exclusive access to a single commercial actor, they say, could create vulnerabilities or competitive imbalances.

Supporters of broader private participation in space operations argue that commercial firms bring technical capabilities and agility that can enhance overall space situational awareness. But observers quoted by media outlets say the new access may give SpaceX a practical edge in tracking orbital traffic, intensifying concerns about market concentration and control over the nascent traffic‑management ecosystem.

The move comes amid increasing attention to how the United States manages the growing congestion in low Earth orbit, where thousands of operational satellites and pieces of debris now circulate. The flow of sensitive data and the governance arrangements around it have become central issues in debates over civil, commercial and military roles in space.

The decision has prompted calls for greater transparency and scrutiny of how space‑tracking capabilities and information are shared between government agencies and private companies, as lawmakers and industry participants weigh the implications for competition, safety and national security.